The e-invoicing obligation has been a reality since January 1, 2025 - and presents large retail companies in particular with strategic decisions. As a decision-maker in an SAP-based retail company with hundreds or thousands of suppliers, you are faced with the question: Which e-invoice format is optimal for our complex processes? XInvoice or ZUGferD?
This article provides you with a sound basis for decision-making with concrete use cases from retail practice.
What does the e-invoicing obligation mean for retailers?
Since January 2025, all B2B companies in Germany must be able to receive and process electronic invoices. For large retail companies, this means
- Immediate obligation to receive: Your systems must already process e-invoices from suppliers
- Gradual dispatch obligation: From 2028, you will also have to send e-invoices (from 2027 if your turnover exceeds 800,000 euros)
- High transaction volumesWith thousands of suppliers and millions of goods movements per year, a robust technical solution is essential
XRechnung vs. ZUGferD: The fundamental differences
XRechnung - The XML standard
FormatPure XML file (machine-readable)
Advantages:
- Maximum automation through pure data structure
- Direct integration into SAP ERP/S/4HANA without media disruptions
- Standard format for B2G transactions (public authorities)
- Mandatory format for public clients since 2020
- Faster processing thanks to dark processing
- Less file size and memory requirements
Disadvantages:
- Not human readable without special viewer software
- Higher acceptance hurdle for smaller suppliers
- Requires complete system integration on both sides
- Visualization of the Invoice requires additional tools
ZUGferD - The hybrid format
FormatPDF with embedded XML file (hybrid)
Advantages:
- Double readability: human (PDF) and machine (XML)
- Greater acceptance with various supplier structures
- Smoother migration of existing PDF invoices
- Flexible use in B2B, B2G and B2C
- Several profiles (BASIC, COMFORT, EXTENDED) for different requirements
- From version 2.1 also XRechnung-compliant
Disadvantages:
- Larger files through PDF+XML combination
- Potentially higher storage and archiving costs
- Risk of inconsistencies between PDF and XML
- Slightly more complex processing
Optimize the reception process
For ZUGferD:
- Input channel: E-mail gateway or supplier portal
- Automatic extraction of XML data from PDF/A-3
- Validation against ZUGferD schema (2.1/2.2)
- Mapping to SAP field structure (BAPI, IDoc)
- Optional OCR check between PDF and XML in the event of discrepancies
- Automatic posting when matched with Order
For XInvoice:
- Input channel: PEPPOL Access Point, central invoice receipt portal or e-mail
- XML validation against XRechnung standard (CEN/EN 16931)
- Direct mapping to SAP documents
- Automatic error check (mandatory fields, routing ID for B2G)
- Workflow trigger for release processes
- Dark processing without manual intervention
Best practices for SAP implementation
Recommendation for most retail companies:
- On the receiving endAccept both formats (format-independent solution)
- Shipping sideSet primarily to one format, depending on your supplier structure
Mastering challenges in the retail sector
Challenge 1: Thousands of suppliers with varying degrees of digitalization maturity
Solution: Format flexibility through hybrid approach
- Main format: ZUGferD for broad acceptance
- XRechnung for digitized partners and B2G
- Conversion services for transition phase
- Supplier management: training and onboarding support
Challenge 2: Millions of transactions per year
SolutionHigh-performance SAP integration
- Batch processing for mass documents
- Parallel processing in SAP
- Automated error handling with exception management
- Dashboard for monitoring and KPIs (dark processing rate, error rate)
Challenge 3: Complex approval workflows
Solution: Intelligent approval processes
- Rule-based release according to product group managers
- Automatic release with three-way match
- Escalation mechanisms in the event of deviations
- Mobile release for decentralized decision-makers
Challenge 4: Archiving and compliance
SolutionGoBD-compliant archiving
- Audit-proof storage of XML and PDF
- 10-year Retention period
- Full-text indexing for fast searches
- Linking with orders and goods receipts
Strategic recommendation for large retail companies
Pragmatic approach for 2025-2028:
Phase 1: Ensure reception
- Implement a solution that both formats (XRechnung and ZUGferD) can receive and process
- Priority: Your SAP systems must be able to process e-invoices with immediate effect
- Tool recommendation: CICS (Cloud Invoice Conversion Service)
Phase 2: Enable suppliers
- Communicate your preferred shipping format to suppliers
- For a broad supplier structure: Recommend ZUGferD as primary format
- For digitized partners: Offer XInvoice
- Offer training and testing environments
Phase 3: Convert your own shipping
- Sending invoices to customers and partners on E-bill convert
- B2G (public authorities, public institutions): XInvoice
- B2B (business customers): ZUGferD for maximum compatibility
- B2C: PDF still possible (with consent)
The role of CICS and CBCS in your e-invoicing transformation
The changeover to E-bill is not just a technical challenge - it is a change management project that affects your entire accounts payable, purchasing management and IT infrastructure.
With CICS, we support you in the strategic planning and implementation of your e-invoicing transformation in the Invoice receipt
- Process consultingAnalysis of your current invoicing processes and supplier structure
- Format strategyJoint development of your format strategy (XRechnung, ZUGferD or hybrid)
- Supplier managementConception and implementation of supplier onboarding programs
- Compliance assuranceCheck for compliance with all legal requirements (UStG, GoBD, EN 16931)
- Change ManagementAccompanying your internal stakeholders (accounting, Purchasing, IT)
With CICS, we support you in the strategic planning and implementation of your e-invoicing transformation in the Outgoing invoice
- Format conversionAutomatic conversion between ZUGferD, XRechnung, PDF
- SAP integrationSeamless connection to standardized interfaces
- ValidationAutomatic checking of incoming invoices for format conformity and mandatory fields
- Scalable cloud solutionProcessing millions of documents without any loss of performance
With the combination of CICS for strategic consulting and CBCS for technical implementation, we offer you a End-to-end solution for your e-invoice compliance - specially tailored to the requirements of large retail companies.
To summarize: The right choice for your retail business
There is no one-size-fits-all answer to the question "XRechnung or ZUGferD?". The optimal strategy depends on your specific situation:
Select ZUGferD if:
- You have a heterogeneous supplier structure with many SMEs
- Your suppliers have different degrees of digitization
- you prefer a smooth migration path from PDF invoices
- you maintain international business relationships
- Flexibility is a priority for you
Select XInvoice if:
- Your core suppliers are highly digitized
- you work primarily with public sector clients
- Maximum automation and efficiency Your goal is
- you already use EDI infrastructure
- You want to process high transaction volumes with minimal costs
Our recommendation for the practice: Rely on a hybrid approachReceive both formats and choose the optimal shipping format depending on your business partner. Modern SAP add-ons and cloud platforms such as CBCS enable this flexibility without additional complexity.
The E-billing obligation is more than just compliance - it is an opportunity to digitize and accelerate your financial processes and reduce costs. With the right strategy, the right tools and experienced partners like Consult-SK, your e-invoicing transformation will be a success.
Would you like to find out more about introducing e-billing in your retail business?
Contact our experts for a free initial consultation. We will analyze your current situation and work with you to develop a tailor-made e-invoicing strategy - technically sound, practical and compliance-compliant.


